On Aug. 4, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit decided Crane v. Penske Transportation Management (No. 25-40012). The question, in the court's own words: can a motor carrier that outsourced a shipping job to a second carrier, which then outsourced it to a third carrier, be held liable for the negligence of the driver hired by the third carrier? The district court in the Southern District of Texas said no. The Fifth Circuit disagreed and reversed. Opinion: https://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/25/25-40012-CV0.pdf
The chain, per the opinion: car-seat maker Adient hired Penske Logistics. Penske handed the job, through its affiliate broker Penske Transportation Management (PTM), to carrier Liberty Lane. Liberty Lane then had its own affiliate broker hire a third carrier, OK Trans, which supplied the truck and the driver. On the way to Laredo, that tractor-trailer jackknifed, crossed into oncoming traffic, and killed Lyndon Dean Meyer. FreightWaves reports the crash happened the day after Christmas 2018 on Highway 202 in Bee County, Texas. That load changed hands more times than a hot plate at a truck-stop potluck, and the court still traced it back to the first carrier.
The key holding: because Penske, a carrier, hired Liberty Lane, a carrier that had leased the truck from OK Trans, their arrangement fell under the federal leasing rules (49 C.F.R. 376.22), which required Penske to take control and responsibility for operating the equipment. That opens the door to statutory-employer, or vicarious, liability for a driver Penske never hired. The court also sent the negligent-hiring claim against the broker affiliate back to the lower court, noting the Supreme Court's 2026 Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II decision abrogated the preemption ruling the district court relied on.
The fight is not over. FreightWaves (John Kingston, Oct. 12, 2026) reports Penske has asked for an en banc rehearing before the full Fifth Circuit, the victim's estate filed its opposition last week, and amicus briefs backing rehearing came from the American Trucking Associations and Truckload Carriers Association (jointly) and from the Trucking Industry Defense Association. Penske argues the ruling is a first in trucking law because it had no arrangement, communication, or knowledge of the final carrier. The plaintiffs argue an indirect arrangement is still an arrangement under the statute. Source: https://www.freightwaves.com/news/penske-request-for-en-banc-hearing-gets-pushback-from-victims-estate